| To: | Bob McGraw - K4TAX <rmcgraw@blomand.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters |
| From: | Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Nov 2013 17:58:45 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
No, I haven’t, but that’s a darn good idea. The wife is sick, so I have plenty of time to play radio on a cold saturday night. I’ll put the MFJ on it and see what it shows Mike Bryce wb8vge prosolar@sssnet.com On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Robert Mcgraw <rmcgraw@blomand.net> wrote: > > That's good news. > > The length of coax is some portion of an electrical wavelength. It > simply adds some value of reactance which then the tuner is able to > match. > > Just for curiosity, have you tried to measure either the Z or the SWR > between the tuner and the LMR400. I bet the SWR is real high. But not > to worry, the LMR400 has low loss even with high SWR. > > 73 > Bob, K4TAX > > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Carl Moreschi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Mike Bryce |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Mike Bryce |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna, resluder@yahoo.com |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |