Re: [TenTec] Older rigs

["Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>]

It seems that we forget that Tentec is a "spin off" company of 
Electro-Voice, a very highly respected audio company.  Some of the original 
staff, originally headed by Albert Kahn (sk), founder of Electro-Voice are 
still at Tentec today in authoritive positions.
The book "TEN-TEC, The First 40 Years, 1968 - 2008" is very informative in 
this regard.
Library of Congress Control Number 2008908127
ISBN:  978-0-615-20575-5

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <Mike_N4NT@charter.net>
To: <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" 
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Older rigs


> Taught a novice class, one of members got ticket and her dad, a ham, sent
> her a TS-930 transceiver. We helped her put up an aerial then sat down at
> the rig to see how it worked. My best rig up til then was a 544 or 546,
> don't remember. I was fascinated with all the bells & whistles available 
> on
> receive. Tuned into a crowded band and played with all the tuning 
> controls.
> With each adjustment, the rig sounded better and better. Finally I turned
> off all that stuff to hear how the receiver sounded without all the finely
> tuned filters, etc., and it sounded even better. Apparently it was the
> change that sounded better and it didn't matter much what it was.
>
> There was no setting on that TS-930 that sounded as good as my old 
> Ten-Tecs.
> 73, Mike N4NT
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Al Gulseth" <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Cc: "Bwana Bob" <wb2vuf@verizon.net>
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 15:46
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Older rigs
>
>
> > Bob,
> >
> > Point (2) is well taken. Back in the days of "vinyl" when I worked in
> > small
> > market radio I could hear when a stylus was getting "edgy" (chipped or
> > worn);
> > it had the same effect on me as a chalkboard screech. Thus I question how
> > much real advantage there is in most normal situations (especially since
> > I'm
> > not a contester or serious DXer) of digital manipulation and its
> > associated
> > artifacts versus the (at least to me) much easier to listen to audio of a
> > purely analog chain.
> >
> > But then again, some folks might not even notice the difference (or at
> > least
> > it might not bother them like it does me.) Guess this is one of
> > those "different strokes for different folks" HI HI!!
> >
> > 73, Al
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec