TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] discarded receiver

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] discarded receiver
From: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:25:16 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Doug,
To provide the interfaces, designs, etc. that are not public domain, to provide substitute software, etc., you are talking about spending for one receiver, about as much as a complete stand alone receiver, IMHO.

You might be able to strap some of the auto controls out of circuit and use the basic receiver block diagram as a simple receiver. What I suspect is that the sub receiver probably used some front end filtering shared with the main receiver, and that is costly to recreate the tuned front end.

It may be that the receiver board was more independent, but my SWAG is it was just duplicating a detector, and perhaps an IF string. Did it even have an independent audio out circuit?

You would have to study the block diagram and schematics well before embarking on such a project. I would also speculate that the demand would be so intermittent or low that it would not be economical to kit up by a vendor.

Certainly, there is nothing in it for Ten Tec, who after all, are selling a complete transceiver with improved sub receiver.

But, if you go to the theory of operation of the model, you might answer these questions after some study.

I have seen many wonderful circuits supplanted by later model upgrades, and I have often wondered why you could not put the whole to work as an independent whatever. invariably, upon close study, these wholesale removed circuits are nothing more than a compact storage of parts which you might reuse in something else completely different. And, that is how they usually end up in our junkboxes.

Stuart Rohre
K5KVH

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>