TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:26:26 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
KO7I:

>This is the most useful bit of info that has come across my computer's
screen in the past few months.

And possibly the most misleading. ARRL changed their methodology for measuring IMD around 2007 by using a 3 Hz BW spectrum analyzer to separate IMD effects from phase noise effects. The human ear has ~50 Hz bandwidth at best so their results are very misleading and not comparable to earlier ones listed on the same chart. If you want meaningful (i.e. what you will hear with your own ears) results that are comparable over time stick to Sherwood's summary.

http://www.sherweng.com/table.html

73, Bill W4ZV

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>