TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Jupiter

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Jupiter
From: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:42:11 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The difference is the ability to hear signals on very crowded bands and 
resistance to front end overload.  The Omni VII has a much better 
receiver than the Jupiter.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Dr.
Hays, NC 28635
www.n4py.com

On 3/19/2011 2:26 PM, Roger Rippy wrote:
>
> The purpose of this post is to get some feedback
> from hams who have had or used both an Omni VII
> and a Jupiter. The difference in cost is significant
> but I do not see a lot of difference in basic
> specifications. Both are 100 watt rigs; both have
> split VFOs and work split;both have full QSK;
> both have a range of filters; the Jupiter has a
> decoder on screen and keyboard interface; and
> so I wonder where the big cost difference comes
> from. I am considering a new rig and cost is a
> factor. I am sure there is a big difference, but
> I have not had the privilege of operating either.
> Tnxs. I will get back to the Russian DX Test. 73s
> Rip   Bozeman, MT  W7RIP
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>