TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle

To: geraldj@weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle
From: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:58:03 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thank you Jerry I will take a look I just ordered the new operating manual will see if any thing in that book addresses receiver issues . thanks John

On 9/30/2010 6:24 PM, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote:
There are a lot more fundamentals in "Experimental Methods in RF Design
Revised First Edition" by Wes Hayward, W7ZOI, Rick Campbell, KK7B, and
Bob Larkin, W7PUA published by ARRL. I found a better price at Amazon.
And there are a lot of fundamentals in then ARRL Handbook any recent
edition.

73, Jerry, K0CQ

On 9/30/2010 2:57 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
John,

Yes, I guess it's not the right paper if you haven't been following RX
performance for a while.

You know, we all started out without any information on receivers and when I
first got interested in them in the mid 70's, I was confused too.  I read a
few articles by Wes Hayward, W7ZOI.  I think I might still have some of them
somewhere.

I read everything I could get ahold of, in English and in German.
Eventually we reached a point where almost all radios had positive Intercept
Points, and each new one seemed to be 1 or 2 dB more than the last.  So we
all started to ask, "How much do we need".

Seems like this might be a good topic for a serious of "simple" articles for
QST.
I'm not sure who we could get to write them.

Let me do some research for you.  Maybe I can find something simpler to
begin with.

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of John Molenda
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:10 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle

    I went to

_  by Peter E. Chadwick, G3RZP, and published in QEX_, as suggested and
attempted to read the
article I am sure it was a great read for a tech but for me the common guy
who has other
talents it was too much .  I have little understanding of the theory needed
to absorb
such a technical article . This I believe is the same reason TT should drill
any holes into
the Eagle body to bring any connection out . John kb2huk
May/June 2002.


On 9/30/2010 1:19 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
    by Peter E. Chadwick, G3RZP, and published in QEX,
May/June 2002.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>