| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. |
| From: | Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:13:12 -0400 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 9/28/2010 10:50 PM, Andrew Moore wrote:
> This is taking into account only dollars -- not features. If you're going
> to scale dollars, shouldn't we scale the state of the art too?
Oh NO, not at all Andy... Because if we believe
all the nostalgic banter, then we would realize
radios were so much better in days gone by, as if
radio is on a reverse technological drift, where
Collins stuff was the best ever, tubes ruled, and
every since the 1960s, everything has continually
degraded in quality and utility.
===================== Just MY take... K8JHR =====================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Eagle/Hamfest Pics, Bruce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Eagle/Hamfest Pics, Rick W |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc., Andrew Moore |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc., Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |