TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec rebranding

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec rebranding
From: ab9go@earthlink.net
Reply-to: ab9go@earthlink.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:47:06 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
But are they going to burn these in??  Also the rig is advertised as a three 
band rig 20, 30 & 40 on the china mfg website but only a two band 20&30 or 
30&40 on the TT website.  

Randy AB9GO 


-----Original Message-----
>From: Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
>Sent: May 25, 2010 2:33 PM
>To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment' <tentec@contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec rebranding
>
>Geoffry, you bring up an excellent point.
>
>Our choices are:
>1. buy an unknown radio from an unknown supplier in china, cheap
>2. buy that same radio for more money but from a US distributor who burns in
>their radios and has renowned service.
>
>I think it would be foolish to choose #1.
>
>I'm anxious to hear users' feedback on these rigs.
>
>73
>Rick
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
>On Behalf Of geoffrey mendelson
>Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 12:51 PM
>To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec rebranding
>
>
>On May 25, 2010, at 1:30 AM, Susan A Walker wrote:
>
>> I've often wondered why Ten-Tec didn't keep its engineering in
>> Sevierville and outsource production to the east. Certainly the build
>> quality and QC of its locally-produced transceivers are nothing
>> special.
>
>This is something completely different. The original radio was  
>designed and manufactured in China. It was first sold as a kit via  
>mail order. Then they were sold fully assembled. A relative of the  
>factory owner lives in Canada, and started selling them in on Ebay.
>
>TenTec is taking the radios as they are built in China, slapping their  
>name on them and selling them. In the computer business this is called  
>OEM'ing, with TenTec being the OEM. (OEM in automotive terms is the  
>exact opposite).
>
>There were complaints about a firmware bug limiting receiver  
>performance, I expect they have been fixed by now.
>
>The big difference between is the TenTec is 2 band, the original is 3.  
>I don't know, but I expect there will be a firmware patch on the  
>internet to make it three band unless there is a hardware limitation.  
>So far they are using the same schematics in their manual as the 3  
>band version, so I doubt it.
>
>My expereince with Chinese manufactured goods is that they do not have  
>the quality control the US consumers demand. If you watched the Orion/ 
>factory tour video, TenTec burns in their radios for 24 hours before  
>they are released for shipping. I expect that they will do the same  
>with the Chinese rigs. If not at first after a few months of a 5%-10%  
>return rate, they will.
>
>>
>> Perhaps slapping a Ten-Tec logo on a radio made in China is a first
>> tentative step in that direction, although in the past Ten-Tec has put
>> its label on Astron power supplies, I believe. Don't know where
>> they're made.
>
>
>Who made their 2m HT?
>
>Geoff.
>
>-- 
>geoffrey mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM
>Jerusalem Israel geoffreymendelson@gmail.com
>New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge  
>or understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the  
>situation. i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found  
>in the Wikipedia.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


Thank you,
Randy AB9GO
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>