| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question |
| From: | "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 May 2010 08:08:21 -0500 (CDT) |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
That's one advantage for the Omni A, Triton 540, and other analog display rigs, no timebase, processor, or other chips to deal with. 73, Curt KB5JO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Slow delivery of digests, Kevin Anderson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question, David Goncalves |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question, Douglas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C question, David Goncalves |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |