| To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Timewave 599ZX-Omni VI Opt 3 |
| From: | "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net> |
| Reply-to: | atrampler@att.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:23:07 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
?Evening, I?m curious if any of you have added a Timewave 599ZX to an Option 3 or Omni VI Plus, and if you did, did it make for a considerable improvement or was it somewhat redundant? I live in an older section of town that is prone to line noise. The NB on my Option 3 is generally useful against it provided there are no strong signals at all close by. Using a CW filter tends to negate the value of the NB because, I imagine, the timing is distorted by signal delay in the filter. The DSP noise reduction on my Omni VI is useless against it. 73, Art Trampler, KØRO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited., Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Timewave 599ZX-Omni VI Opt 3, Jim Brown K9YC |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] swap PTO with DDS-VFO?, Bill Acito W1PA |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Timewave 599ZX-Omni VI Opt 3, Jim Brown K9YC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |