| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Titan III 417A...... |
| From: | Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:49:35 -0400 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Oh... I dunno... I suppose if the used one offered in a private sale
without TT warranty was in substantially better condition, with, say,
substantially "lower mileage" and way better cosmetics, etc., then it
might fetch a higher price.
Just MY take.
=========== K8JHR ============
_______________________________________________________
On 3/20/2010 2:04 PM, d.e.warnick@comcast.net wrote:
that includes return policy and a warranty, so the fair value
would be something less than that.
=======================================================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Reflector Problems, DAVID HELLER |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Titan III 417A......, Barry N1EU |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Titan III 417A......, d . e . warnick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Titan III 417A......, Barry N1EU |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |