TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Colliins SWR Bridge.....I'm also interested in EWR-PWR inst

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Colliins SWR Bridge.....I'm also interested in EWR-PWR instrumentation.
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:18:30 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>


I'm not overly impressed with the commonly accepted Bird meters in the ham
community. I am looking for something much better, for sure. Guess I should
look into this Collins Bridge 312B-4 or go to calibrated occiliscopes.
Not sure what you mean by this. A calibrated oscilloscope, with a properly compensated probe, may be able to make a more accurate RF voltage measurement. If you want an indication of the ratio of forward and reflected RF power, you will still need to connect the scope to some type of directional coupler or bridge.

Last time I checked oscilloscope voltage measurement accuracy specifications, good ones were on the order of +/- 1%. (That was a long time ago, so maybe they are a lot better these days. But then if you're thinking of using a used oscilloscope.....) When using that figure to calculate power, assuming a known impedance, using E squared/R, you are going to get hardly better than +/- 2% accuracy. If you include imbalances in the directional coupler forward and reflected coupling factors, pretty soon you're going to be back down to Bird model 43 wattmeter accuracies.

Anyway, when it comes to checking an antenna system VSWR, super high accuracy is not needed to determine whether the SWR is low enough, nor is it needed to adjust a matching device, or the antenna, for minimum reflected power.

DE N6KB



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>