| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII |
| From: | Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:00:07 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Ed Purvis <wa4njy_am@yahoo.com> wrote: > Right, I should have also stated others have an issue with it and there is a > mod(somewhere) to work around it for questionable benefits. For the minority of users who like "higher" fidelity, the mod's benefits are not "questionable", but they are probably questionable for most folks. But we're going off on a tangent. The original post asked whether the Omni 7 hears better on cw than the Omni 6+ and I doubt that is the case. 73, Barry N1EU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII, Ed Purvis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up?, d . e . warnick |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII, Ed Purvis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII, Bob McGraw - K4TAX |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |