| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? |
| From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:18:54 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
1) Tuners struggle most when they're dealing with low impedances at low
frequencies. So, using an electrically short dipole on 160m and then
dividing the impedance by 4 is a bad idea - much better to use a 1:1 if
you need a Balun.
2) As others have said, a current Balun is a better choice than a
voltage Balun (transformer) because the core is energised only by the
common-mode current, not by the full Tx power.
3) If the 4:1 voltage balun is wound on a powder-iron core, chances are
it has nowhere near enough winding inductance to be acting properly as a
4:1 impedance transformer.
So if your tuner has an integral 4:1 voltage balun wound on a powder iron core, it'll be a poor performer on all 3 counts. 73, Steve G3TXQ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up?, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up?, Jim Brown K9YC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up?, Jim Brown K9YC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up?, Rsoifer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |