TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New Firmware

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Firmware
From: "Bob Close" <rclose@nhwisp.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:48:36 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I just went back to the beginning of my watching this reflector--I was and am still considering the purchase of an O-VII to replace the venerable Omni VI+ . I started watching this to learn about the rig through the eyes of others. In this year I have learned the following: 1. The rig is great, it does the job it was designed to do. 2. Or, the rig sucks, because the user is computer illiterate or technology challenged.

On the subject of the Orion software, it is even more obvious that many hams haven't the slightest idea of how two computer-based machines communicate with one another. I can't believe that one person, never mind scores of them, think that a serial connection communicates slower than using carrier pigeons, and that such behavior is poor programming by Ten-Tec, when the problem is simple: the rig owner is clueless as to how to set up for and to perform the upgrade, so they blame it on the rig manufacturer. One guy blamed a tuner problem on software! (even knowing his 20+ year old antenna had bad connections!!??) (I erased it, but seem to remember a tile of "buggy software problem in new release" .For God's sake, read the directions! (all of them, and if you don't know what a parity bit is or what is meant by flow control settings when setting up a serial connection, take five minutes to understand what you are doing, don't just skip over that paragraph!) If all else fails, think about your observations a bit before firing off a "Ten-Tec Sucks" posting, please. Blaming a KNOWN crap antenna problem on Ten-Tec software is absurd.

Simply amazing, and indicative of a deep underlying concern I have about our society: Instead of an attitude of "can do" it is now "blame your inadequacies on someone else, preferably someone you can sue". Nobody reads release notes, nobody understands the meaning of "Beta", nobody takes time to learn about the computer or radio, or anything else they buy. They expect to know how to do things by some ethereal transfer of knowledge without effort. When things have sunk to such a low that egg farmers label their egg cartons with the warning "contains egg", you have to wonder what the hell is going on. Common sense isn't common any more. That's what we get when we elect lawyers to make the laws: Laws that require more lawyers. DUH! (whew, I feel better)

As far as Ten-Tec monitoring and/or using a reflector to communicate: at what level of dumbness would they address their comments to? I think that they do a pretty good job of building rigs. I know they do a great job of repairing their stuff. Their documentation of hardware upgrades leaves a lot to be desired, while the documentation of theory of operation is excellent, giving me enough ammunition to solve or answer most questions. Overall, I do business with them because their stuff is better than the Japanese( entry to mid level )equipment. To find something that compares with a $5k Orion you need to consider a $10k rice box. On top of that, my cash goes to an American supporting his family, as opposed to a Japanese family. In today's world this is an important consideration, at least to me. I really don't think it is a manufacturer's responsibility to answer or even acknowledge questions that they have already addressed in the documentation. If they had a canned answer: "Read the Manual", people would complain that they didn't read it to them. If they were read to, people would complain about their inability to understand. If they spent enough time to help the guy understand, he would complain about the complexity of the product. No, I am ok with Ten-Tec avoiding this reflector--it proves they know where effort would be wasted.

Some of you should consider going back to smoke signals! "Warning(insert ten languages here): use of smoke signals exposes you to smoke, which could make your eyes water. If you fall off the cliff because of watering eyes, remember: you were warned".





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>