TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s)

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s)
From: lee berman <w1idz@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: lee berman <lberman@alumni.neu.edu>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
In my 34-year career I've been an engineer and engineering manager at both 
large and small companies.  

I applaud the open -door policy that TenTec has tried to maintain for hams, but 
think it's time to change the policy.

Jack, if you're listening, now that there's a web page that we can look to for 
information, and Scott has been made de-facto "point man" for info on new 
releases, changes, modifications, etc.  Tell the engineers to stop answering 
customer questions of that nature, and defer them to Scott or someone else 
designated as PIO.

Besides "distressing" and "upsetting" some customers, it probably puts some 
emotional hurt on the engineer, who gives out info that is correct as he knows 
it at the time, but for unforeseen reasons turns out to be inaccurate.

It seems obvious to me, after reading some of these posts, that some in the ham 
community would prefer to be uninformed rather than misinformed.

I'm curious to see if the post-Boxboro contingent has similar stories to post 
to those posted post-Dayton.

Triton IV,  580 Delta,  Omni VI,  Jupiter  owner


      
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>