TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II
From: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@qwest.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:15:22 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
or Orion 565 and OII 566 ?

----- Original Message ----- From: "John K Gotwals" <john@gotwals.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II


I sometimes use the term "Orion I", because if I don't  the listener often
asks me if I am using the I or II. Rather than going into a discourse about
JKF and JFK Jr, I find it easier to just specify Orion I up front.

John, N9JG

= = = = = Original message = = = = =
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 09:49:00 -0600
From: Leo Bricker K5LDB <k5ldb.leo@gmail.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II
To: tentec@contesting.com
Message-ID: <479CA7EC.1030907@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
[snip]
Just as JFK didn't suddenly change to JFK I when JFK Jr came along,
the Orion  didn't change into the Orion I. It's either Orion / Orion
II or it's O /  O II / O 2. DROP THE I. There is no I associated with
the original  Orion, Roman or otherwise.

--
73 K5LDB

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>