To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 425 titan |
From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:52:28 -1000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> The E was the export model. I would guess that the rest of the world > doesn't have the CB'ers to contend with. > The whole world has CB'ers to contend with. The difference is that not all of the world's regulatory agencies choose a policy that penalizes law abiding radio amateurs in an attempt to deal with a problem caused by CB'ers who are ignoring the law anyway. The ban on 10 meter capability of amplifiers was no doubt one of the reasons that Ten-Tec discontinued the 405 amplifier. It was also an impediment to Elecraft's 100 watt upgrade to the K2. One could make comparisons with gun registration laws, wherein law abiding citizens are burdened with regulations that cannot stop outlaws from breaking the law, but I digress. The ban on 10 meter capabilities in commercially available amplifiers has been changed lately, has it not? What are the details now? DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni V noise and display problems, Tony Berg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Amplifier Rules, Ken Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 425 titan, John Cox |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 425 titan, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |