| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Peter W. Dahl Company |
| From: | "Jim" <jdunbar28@mchsi.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:29:35 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
That is more than a loss to Ham Radio. That is a SERIOUS National Security Issue -----Original Message----- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Lyle Dunlap Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 6:01 PM To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: Re: [TenTec] Peter W. Dahl Company No but will call tomorrow to check, that would be a loss. Will let you know what I find out. Lyle W9FCX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 40M Band Sweeps, Paul Christensen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Peter W. Dahl Company, Jim |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Peter W. Dahl Company, Lyle Dunlap |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Peter W. Dahl Company, Stuart Rohre |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |