TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] WIDER FILTER FOR WEAK CW DXING?

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] WIDER FILTER FOR WEAK CW DXING?
From: ynkedragon@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:14:20 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Jeff,

I had a similar experience with my Argosy. Then I discovered that tweaking the alignment so that the desired signal falls into the center of the filter passband made a BIG difference. Now the narrowed passband enhances weak signals. I still touch up my Argosy alignment about every 3 years. I don't know the Omni6, but a similar minor adjustment may be possible with it, too.

73, Blair k3yd


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Frank <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
To: TenTec@contesting.com
Sent: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 9:19 am
Subject: [TenTec] WIDER FILTER FOR WEAK CW DXING?



I have an Omni 6 opt 1, which I like very much, but on weak cw signals, my experience with the filters seems counter-intuitive. I almost always have easier and clearer copy on weak cw signals when I use the 1.8 khz filter vs. the .5 or .25 khz filters in my 6.3 mhz IF. I've got nothing in the N1 position. Is this the way it's suppposed to be? I always thought narrowing the filter bandwidth is supposed to cut down on noise but it seems opposite. Has it got something to do with receivers that are optimized for adjacent signal rejection vs. signal to noise ratio? I think I read that somewhere. Can anyone explain this to me?
Thanks.

Jeff Frank
(KX2P)
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>