TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VII

To: <kd3jf@arrl.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII
From: "Reg Unsworth" <reg.unsworth@btopenworld.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:46:15 +0100
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
the xyl?   ;>)


----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Gates, KD3JF" <pearly732003@yahoo.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII


I would love to have a Omni VII ! Now lets see.... What do I have that I can sell?

Paul

Art Lewis <wa8vsj@ameritech.net> wrote: John

I have talked to three owners of new Omni VII and they sound great and the
owners love them. None of these hams were using it with a computer and only
one had plans to do so in the future. They all thought receiver was great.

                  73 Art WA8VSJ
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Rippey"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 9:58 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Omni VII


I'm intrigued by the lack of comments on the July QST review of the
OMNI VII.

It's a very good radio, if a bit pricey, for everyday ham use, and I
would have thought there would be discussion of the review and lab
results. Not so.

Is it because the radio has no appeal to participants in this list?
Can it be that the radio's major appeal is to computer-bound folks
who want to operate remotely?

That's certainly the theme of Ten-Tec's advertising, at least.

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>