TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Slightly OT: Astron question, correction

To: geraldj@storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Slightly OT: Astron question, correction
From: Larry Keith <kq4by@rocketmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:28:17 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi...

I just replaced the one in my RS-20M with an NTE 5539.

73,

Larry
KQ4BY

Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 00:22 -0400, Michael Tortorella wrote:
Hi, last post I said the S0535W SCR was 400V, 55A....looks like the CORRECT
numbers are 50V, 35A.  Same question, though...would a 100V 70A (for
example) be OK?
Thanks again
Mike W2IY

The crowbar SCR needs only to have higher voltage rating than the power
supply output, but 50 volts is as low as they sell. Higher voltage
rating is no problem, just greater cost, but has no effect on the
operation. With in reason, higher current rating is no problem other
than the greater cost, but too much higher current rating may slow the
turn on time of the SCR or demand a greater gate current than the gate
circuit is designed to supply. The greater current SCR may be a physical
fit problem because it can be larger.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>