| To: | geraldj@storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Slightly OT: Astron question, correction |
| From: | Larry Keith <kq4by@rocketmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:28:17 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi... I just replaced the one in my RS-20M with an NTE 5539. 73, Larry KQ4BY Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 00:22 -0400, Michael Tortorella wrote:Hi, last post I said the S0535W SCR was 400V, 55A....looks like the CORRECT numbers are 50V, 35A. Same question, though...would a 100V 70A (for example) be OK? Thanks again Mike W2IYThe crowbar SCR needs only to have higher voltage rating than the power supply output, but 50 volts is as low as they sell. Higher voltage rating is no problem, just greater cost, but has no effect on the operation. With in reason, higher current rating is no problem other than the greater cost, but too much higher current rating may slow the turn on time of the SCR or demand a greater gate current than the gate circuit is designed to supply. The greater current SCR may be a physical fit problem because it can be larger. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] What does a "T" mean after the frequency?, Geoff Stokes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] (no subject), Ken Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Slightly OT: Astron question, correction, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Slightly OT: Astron question, correction, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |