TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Fwd: RE: RM 11306

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Fwd: RE: RM 11306
From: "Frank Holladay" <holladayfd@multipro.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:25:01 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thursday, I received a certificate from ARRL commemorating my 40th. year as a member. After this, I don't think there will be a 41st!
73,
Frank K4VMO

----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:43 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Fwd: RE: RM 11306


<<<Digital emissions using multiple carriers, such as OFDM, can be designed
for any bandwidth while staying within the existing rules. So,
the subset of proposed rule changes given to the FCC on February
13 includes a bandwidth limit of 3 kHz on RTTY and data emissions
below 28 MHz. It is important to understand that this does not
increase the allowed bandwidth for RTTY and data emissions; it
actually represents a new limitation that accommodates existing
practice but prevents future monopolization of large segments of
our narrow MF/HF bands by a single digital station. >>>

I have a problem with what appears to be "premptive regulation."  Why not
wait until there is a problem instead of regulation by fear, uncertainty and doubt which might lead to the squelching of development of a new mode? _________________________________________________________________
Live Search Maps - find all the local information you need, right when you
need it. http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag2&FORM=MGAC01




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>