Re: [TenTec] LOTW

["Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>]

If you remember, E-QSL at one time had an electronic signature requirment. 
This was to make the security such that the ARRL would accept their product. 
The ARRL rejected it because they wanted their own.
Bill  KC4ATU


> From: wo8l@aol.com
> Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] LOTW
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:01:39 -0400
>
> Hello Again,
>
> N4PY mentioned that his response rate might be fairly low because he has a 
> lot of older QSOs posted.
> In my personal experience, I like E-QSL because I'm constantly amazed how I 
> get a QSL from a CW contact the previous day right above one from 1992.  I 
> rarely check into LOTW because my total seldom change.
> I still think the ARRL has missed the mark.  They ought to team up with 
> E-QSL or somebody similar and design something more appealing and 
> effective.
> 73s,
>
> rick
> ________________________________________________________________________
> AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
> from AOL at AOL.com.
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_________________________________________________________________
With tax season right around the corner, make sure to follow these few 
simple tips. 
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.aspx?icid=HMFebtagline