To: | john@503bartley.com,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] CW needs its own list |
From: | joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:50:12 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Perhaps we first need a list to discuss the merits of having a separate list for CW? 73, Joel, W1ZR K7AAY john@503bartley.com wrote: >May I please suggest a separate list be established to discuss CW matters? I >don't mean to denigrate the magicians of brass, but it's a rather different >issue than Ten-Tec equipment and therefore should have its own place. > >73s and best regards >K7AAY >_______________________________________________ >TenTec mailing list >TenTec@contesting.com >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec > > > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] CW needs its own list, Lew |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Multiple CW interest lists already exist...., Jerry Volpe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] CW needs its own list, Lew |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] CW needs its own list, David S. McCallum |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |