| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Eliminating CW as a License Requirement |
| From: | w8au@sssnet.com |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:06:39 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
At 07:39 AM 12/18/06, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: >To repeat myself, I think the only way to preserve CW is to make new >hams feel that it is a benefit to them. Removing the requirement should pique the interest of many, plus remove the "stubborn resistance" syndrome of those who thought they didn't like it but never experienced it. Perry w8au _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 48, Issue 43, KA5M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Eliminating CW as a License Requirement, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Eliminating CW as a License Requirement, Geoffrey S. Mendelson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Eliminating CW as a License Requirement, Dave Edwards |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |