| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] O2 Backlighting Longevity |
| From: | "John B. Egger" <john_egger@comcast.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:06:50 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Doug Turnbull wrote: Along this line, is there an easy way to reduce the "low" backlight even farther? I'd prefer something lower than "low."Hi All, Can anyone tell me what the expected life of the O2 display backlight is. Does it make sense to use the lowest illumination level as a means of extending the life span. Is this even an issue? I have been wondering and this is the place to seek out an answer. I most enjoy reading the contributions each day. Thanks & 73 Doug EI2CN _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec -- --John K3GHH Registered Linux User #291592 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] O2 Backlighting Longevity, ss409ss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Orion II Backlight, Charles Strickland |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] O2 Backlighting Longevity, ss409ss |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Orion II Backlight, Charles Strickland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |