TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 2.059d: BinRx still broken

To: <wc1m@msn.com>,"Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 2.059d: BinRx still broken
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:47:30 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
If you are using Heil headphones that have the phase switch, try running the 
phones out of phase.  If you don't have those, try reversing the phase of 
one of the phones by making a jumper with a switch so you can try it both 
ways and unplug it if you don't like the sound.

Ron N6AHA


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
To: "Ten Tec Reflector" <tentec@contesting.com>; "Orion Yahoo Group" 
<orion565@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 12:17 PM
Subject: [TenTec] 2.059d: BinRx still broken


> As in previous V2 releases, BinRx doesn't work in 2.059d. It changes the
> audio, producing a sort of "surround sound" effect, but doesn't create any
> spatial differentiation between CW signals of different pitch.
>
> In V1, signals matching the selected sidetone pitch appeared centered
> between the headphones, signals lower in pitch were shifted towards the 
> left
> headphone and signals higher in pitch were shifted towards the right
> headphone (the "spread", or degree of shifting, should have been greater,
> but it was useful nonetheless.) In 2.059d, signals of all pitches appear
> centered between the headphones. The difference between the two versions 
> is
> readily apparent when tuning across a CW signal.
>
> 73, Dick WC1M
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>