To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] AM receive with v 2.037j |
From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 11 Sep 2006 06:44:56 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> bad. Later though, after I discovered that hang time was > needed for SSB receive, and I tried listening to AM with some > hang and slow recovery time, and all of a sudden, it sounded > great! > Again, the trick is hang time. Someone is going to have to explain to me why this isn't indicative of a problem. Makes no sense why one would have to use hang and/or slow recovery on an AM signal for it to sound good. Don't get me wrong, I do like the "new" radios, but something isn't right with this. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] AM receive with v 2.037j, Ron Castro |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Audio Outputs Different V2.059 ?, R. Brent Zook |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] AM receive with v 2.037j, Ron Castro |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] V2.059 Speech Processing, Merle Bone |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |