TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] AM receive with v 2.037j

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] AM receive with v 2.037j
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 06:44:56 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
> bad.  Later though, after I discovered that hang time was 
> needed for SSB receive, and I tried listening to AM with some 
> hang and slow recovery time, and all of a sudden, it sounded 
> great!  
> Again, the trick is hang time.  

Someone is going to have to explain to me why this isn't indicative of a
problem.  Makes no sense why one would have to use hang and/or slow recovery
on an AM signal for it to sound good.

Don't get me wrong, I do like the "new" radios, but something isn't right
with this.

Grant/NQ5T


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>