TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] An accessory idea for the new Omni VII

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] An accessory idea for the new Omni VII
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:14:03 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Paul,

The FCC part 97 sections that deal with the use of the amateur bands for control links, controlling radio systems that are operating on other bands, are specifying which amateur bands can and can not be used for control links. Those sections are not stating that a control link must be a radio link on an amateur band. You can use any kind of link you like, wire, fiber, laser, neutrino subspace, whatever, provided you really do have control and you don't violate some other section of the FCC rules. You can use an unlicensed 2.4 GHz link, you could even use modified cordless phones, or possibly even some other part 15 device on just about any frequency IF you really have control, such that unlicensed folks cannot transmit over your remote controlled transmitter. Your level of success is likely to be higher if you do use an amateur band control link, because you can probably run more power (on the control link) and not just anybody can use a device that is likely to QRM your link and put you out of control of your transmitter.

DE N6KB

Paul wrote:
Duane,
I've been thinking of such a remote idea with the Pegasus. But how do you reconcile the FCC "control of remote enquipment" sections. I though control channels had to be on 440Mhz? Is remote control via the internet and computer interface exempt?

73,
Paul
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>