| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... |
| From: | "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com> |
| Reply-to: | John Vickers <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:21:56 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message -----
From: "OE3ZK Gert" <oe3zk@aon.at>
P.S.: I primarily do not judge "good" radios by "numbers" given in the test reviews.....Lab testing does not find all the problems... Nor do I, Gert.But, the numbers keep me from wasting my time and money on radios that don't have even a slight chance of pleasing me. Especially when those numbers are confirmed by more than one source. 73, WA4TT |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] On being a contrarian, Douglas Shock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...., Martin Ewing |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...., Martin Ewing |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Being a Contrarian, OE3ZK Gert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |