TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] What version?

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] What version?
From: "J.Reed" <jhreed@chilitech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:36:23 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks Tod, good find on the loose screws... Jim Reed.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tod Glenn 
  To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 13:27
  Subject: Re: [TenTec] What version?



  On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Bob Cunnings wrote:

  > I'm using 2.056, runtime stability was paramount for me. With 1.372 my
  > rig locked up from time to time, but 2.056 is rock solid. Since I'm a
  > CW op the 2.056 issues often discussed here don't impact me, and I
  > have grown accustomed to the minor display oddities (ragged
  > justification of certain lines of text, and funny offset in sweep
  > display in UCW mode).
  >
  > Bob NW8L

  I'm running 2.056 as well.  I'm a CW only op, and don't do  
  contesting.  The reality is that the radio is probably more than I  
  need, but I love the sensitivity and after owning several TenTec  
  radios (C21, Argosy II, Corsair II, Argonaut 5 and Jupiter) , as well  
  as a couple of Icom and Yaesu radios, I knew I wanted another  
  TenTec.  Truth be told, I think for a general get on the air radio, I  
  like the corsair II best - mostly for its simplicity and great  
  receive.  But I do love my Orion, particularly when working those  
  borderline QRP radios.  Diversity reception is amazing.
  ----
  Tod Glenn
  N7JQW
  SKCC #1444
  ARCI #12420
  FISTS #12134
  NAQCC #1283

  n7jqw@cordite.com




  _______________________________________________
  TenTec mailing list
  TenTec@contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>