TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Dual Receivers

To: <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>,"Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Dual Receivers
From: "Don Prater" <w4to@charter.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:49:15 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
This would be a great step forward for TT...hope Gary is listening.

73...W4TO


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:33 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Dual Receivers


> Two identical phase locked receivers in a single box would be a first ( 
> at least in the past decade or two )  and would be welcomed by low band 
> operators wanting to use diversity/interferometry/phasing techniques to 
> dig the DX out of the noise. Using DSP correlation processes with the 
> outputs from two identical front ends and IFs might make the best weak 
> signal receiver ever marketed to hams.
> 
> In all the various rigs that have a second receiver, the second receiver 
> is second rate, even if it is as good as most receivers available ten 
> years ago.
> 
> DE N6KB
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>