The Omni-C was the first to have bandswitch positions marked for all three
WARC bands. Those markings were deceptive because operation on the 17 meter
band caused spurious emissions. This is because of the frequency mixing
scheme used and that scheme is identical to the Omni-A, Omni-D and Omni-B.
Regards,
Mike N4NT
----- Original Message -----
From: "James C. Owen, III" <k4cgy_list@yahoo.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers
> Hi William,
> The Omni C was the last of this line of the Omni's and had all
> the proper mods made. It also worked properly on the WARC bands.
> I know C before D. The process was Omni A (analog)model 545; Omni
> A series B, Model 545B; Omni D (digital display) model 546; Omni
> D series B model 546B; Omni D series C (also known as Omni C)
> Model 546C. The model 546C was the only one with the WARC bands
> that worked properly, others has spurs due to choice of IF
> frequencies.
> Here is a good web site that tells about the different ten-tec
> equipment. http://www.qsl.net/tentec/
> 73 Jim K4CGY
>
> --- William Lee <n5wrx@stx.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Jim, why the Omni C before the Omni D?
>>
>> William Lee
>>
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2006, at 5:20 PM, James C. Owen, III wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Ken,
>> > I think all of the TT's before the OMNI V, Paragon are
>> > non-digital except for the display on some. My choice would
>> be
>> > 1st a Corsair II, 2nd Corsair, 3rd Omni C, 4th any other Omni
>> A,D
>> > etc. If you want the WARC bands then a Corsair will be your
>> best
>> > choice.
>> > 73 Jim K4CGY
>> >
>> > --- Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|