| To: | wb5jnc@gulseth.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] The Bug |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
| Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:08:12 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Al and all, Also, I had to think about this for a minute -- I believe Ken is mixing his transmitter models (not that it's any big deal, just brings back memories HI HI!!) RCA used _4-400s_ in the BTA 1R transmitter at the small-town AM station I worked for early in my broadcast career. I may be wrong about the model number (thought it was BT1K), I am sure the old RCA TX at KVEC 920 kHz in San Luis Obispo used four 833As. It probably was a parallel pair, and not push-pull finals. Definitely push-pull modulator. They also had a newer TX (brand name I can't remember, NOT RCA) that used 4-400s. That one was purchased used from a station formerly on 1030 kHz (or something like that) and the "engineer" (not a General Class or better ham by the way) neglected to retune the second harmonic trap from 2060 kHz to 1840 kHz. They had quite a signal on 160 meters. In fact it exceeded FCC part 73 rules. They refused to do anything about it until I made measurements and sent the results to the FCC. DE N6KB |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 6 m transverter recommendation?, ve1bn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 6 m transverter recommendation?, Reed O. Krenn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] The Bug, Al Gulseth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] The Bug, Ken Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |