TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results

To: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:46:44 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
You have a good sense of humor, Grant, and around here you need it!!!

Happy St. Patty's Day....I'm off for some Irish Whiskey in a wee bit...I 
wish I could work that TY5 3.506.06 before I go, but 'tis not in the cards 
right now from N. CA.

Ron
N6AHA

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
To: "'Ron Castro'" <ronc@sonic.net>; "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" 
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results


>
>>
>> I guess the question is: is THD measured in voltage or power?
>
> Voltage.  Sinisa was correct in the computation of "THD".  The "% harmonic
> distortion" number I used in my first post, and Lankford used in his 
> paper,
> was based on power.
>
> So to prevent any further bad grades on the subject, I will publish the
> results I get tonight in units of "THD", and even try to take into account
> at least the 3rd harmonic.
>
> No attempt at a good deed EVER goes unpunished :-)
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>