Hi Randy,
The dipole, which could be used as a T is less than 30 feet above the
ground, and has no radial system below it (yet), except the system which
radiates (geometrically that is) from the base of the inverted L. The
inverted L has a vertical section about 45 feet tall and the semi
horizontal part of the L gets as high as 60 feet above the ground, and
it has a fairly extensive ground radial system. I am fairly certain that
the L is much more efficient for transmitting than the T will ever be,
even if I added a large ground radial system at the base of the T. For
receiving, the T by itself may in fact be superior for the reasons you
have stated. Using it by itself is one of the options I will want to
have for my receive antenna selection.
DE N6KB
Randy Russe3ll wrote:
My understanding is why bother phasing the L? The "T"
will have a superior overhead notch and better than an
"L" for quieter receive and more low angle transmit.
See CEBIK antenna site for details of the T setup and
voltage feed particulars.
--- Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> wrote:
Yes!
ALSO, don't forget the knife switch! A knife
switch before entering shack, that disconnects the
feedline, and shorts it together for a voltage
Thanks for reminding me. I can do that in time for
the CQ 160 CW test,
and then phase it with my inverted L, perhaps to
some advantage for
receiving noise rejection. Doubt that I'd get any
worthwhile TX gain,
but maybe. All the controls will be right in the
shack. More Knobs to
twiddle!
DE N6KB
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|