| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni VI |
| From: | W5vhp@aol.com |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:13:19 EST |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 1/18/2006 9:03:16 P.M. Central Standard Time, n0fqnd2@charter.net writes: I've been doing some reasearch into the Omni VI and I'm a little unclear about the differences between the 563 and the 564. Also what each option step adds to the 563 or 564. Dan, The best way to get an "education" on the rigs and their differences is to check out the ARRL product review in Nov. 1997 QST. Or, you can download the review at the ARRL website. 73, Larry W5VHP |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good?, Randy Russe3ll |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Fw: Paragon Phase Noise problem, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni VI, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] 02 shipments, Ken Waites |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |