| To: | gsm@mendelson.com, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II - Initial Reactions and Impressions |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:24:24 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: I should have clarified. S meters are virtually meaningless as signal strength indicators, because they are hooked up to antenna systems that vary over such a wide range of gains/efficiencies and in such a wide range of environments. S meters are however NOT useless. There are useful to compare from day to day, or antenna to antenna AT ONE QTH. They are not useful to compare readings from one QTH with differnt antenna systems and local conditions to another.On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 08:21:03AM -1000, Ken Brown wrote:S-meter readings are already virtually meaningless.Yes, but what worries me is that almost all the time using the same antenna. my Argo 509, Triton-IV digital, Drake TR-5, Kenwood TS-430s and R5000 all read within one S unit of each other. DE N6KB |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II - Initial Reactions and Impressions, Rick Williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] CVS TDE headphones, ron |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II - Initial Reactions and Impressions, Geoffrey S. Mendelson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II - Initial Reactions and Impressions, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |