If Open Source software will put SDR vendors out of business, how do you
explain the success of RedHat, SUSE and others that are benefiting from the
Open Source movement started by Linux?
Dave
K5WNV
(an independent (for profit) software developer :>)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000
SDR-1000 is a big plus with few negatives. You get faster
development (more man-hours of development and test), faster
bugfixes, and lots of creative exchange among users &
programmers all for minimum cost to the manufacturer. TT and
other vendors, take note!
By definition, the "value" of an SDR is going to be in the software, and
not
in the diminishing number of hardware bits that front-end it. Software,
as
protected Intellectual Property (IP), is where the value is. I agree that
there's value in open source. It's a place for experimentation and
innovation. Ultimately, it's value-less if it's free, and that puts SDR
vendors out of business unless the open source eventually becomes closed
and
proprietary, and therefore has value as IP.
Flex is using open source (read that as free volunteer written software)
to
add value to their hardware modules. You get half a radio at something
more
than half the price, and for now the entire back-end part of the radio is
a
PC, soundcard, and free software. As Flex's "half" shrinks where are they
going to make a dime? The user community isn't suddenly going to be happy
about having to shell out several $000 for the FlexPRO software release,
but
if that doesn't happen, the Flex will forever be a tinkerer's radio, even
if
an interesting and fun one ....
Grant/NQ5T
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|