TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Rationale for the PROC selection of the Inrad Roofing Filte

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Rationale for the PROC selection of the Inrad Roofing Filter
From: Charles Greene <crgreene@cox.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 23:55:10 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Good rationale Dave,

I had also decided to use the PROC switch, but I didn't know all the rationale behind it. I need details of where to find the leads and how interface them to the Inrad filter. I have the 600 Hz roofing filter.

Can you please send me some more details?

Tnx,

Chas, W1CG

At 01:26 PM 8/7/2005, you wrote:
This is to clarify my rationale for using the PROC switch to activate the Inrad roofing filter modification. For those not familiar with the history of this, I performed this modification to my Omni VI+ (opt 3) over 2-1/2 years ago while testing various home-designed roofing filters, and needed a front panel selection capability so that I could record A/B test data while still keeping
the N1 (500 Hz) and N2 (250 Hz) filters independently selectable.



The primary requirements (for the modification of the Inrad roofing filter implementation) were: (1) the implementation needed to simply take the roofing filter selection off of the N1/N2 buttons, (2) without incurring any additional components, with a (3) minimum of effort, and (4) with minimal impact to other operating modes and functions. These requirements narrowed the design to only one choice of front panel switch . the PROC switch, which is a "hard" switch with push-push states.



The question has been raised on the reflector as to why not use the FM or VOICE or other main keypad switches to select the Inrad roofing filter, switches that (appear to) have less of an impact on
operational modes than the PROC switch.



The first reason is that ALL of the main keypad switches are "soft" switches, which are scanned by the microprocessor, and do not provide a permanent status of the selected state. Use of any of the soft switches for this modification would require an additional PC board with buffer and latch circuits, contrary to requirements 1, 2 and 3, and would require removal of the Logic Board in order to implement the interface in hardware. Further, use of the FM button would require a software
change, as once the button is depressed; the radio is in the FM mode!



Use of the VOICE button on the main keypad would, in addition to the above four requirements, require the optional voice board to be installed, a further complication of requirements 1-4.



Dave, K1FK

Fort Kent, ME


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>