To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] ft/m or m/ft? |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:47:24 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
DJ0IP wrote: >To be almost exact it is 3.05 ft. (and exactly 3.048 ft.) Your memory is wrong Rick...but I know how you got there because I recognized the "3048" sequence. That is actually .3048 m/ft, not 3.048 ft/m. As someone else stated the actual value of ft/m is 3.281 ft, which comes from 1/.3048. So a meter is about 10% longer (~3.3') than a yard (3.0 ft). 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] WTB 706, Sonny Eisenberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits", Gary Hoffman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] WTB 706, Sonny Eisenberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ft/m or m/ft?, Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |