To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 |
From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:43:01 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> Grant, this seems to be a common misconception since > someone on the Yahoo FT-9000 reflector made almost the > identical comment.. You're right -- I wasn't thinking about the swept results in the Expanded Report. Wouldn't be a bad thing if narrower spaced numbers were included in the main report, too, though, since 2Khz spacing is more or less a defacto standard as the ranking comparison for some of the other testing gurus. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000, Bill Tippett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000, Tracy, Michael, KC1SX |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000, Bill Tippett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000, Tracy, Michael, KC1SX |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |