To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? |
From: | joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:15:50 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Of course I meant to say "1/4 wave vertical fed against ground", not
"ground plane", which neatly sidesteps the ground loss problem as far as
feed efficiency is concerned. BTW, neither that, nor " vertical dipoles" help with the ground loss wavelengths away, which is why some people (especially near the ocean) have great luck with verticals and others (like me on New England rocks) don't. Completely separate story from feed efficiency. 73, Joel joel hallas wrote: Keep in mind that the ground for these resistors doesn't have to be anywhere near as good as for a ground plane, for example. In that case a few ohms of resistance reduces your efficiency . _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam?, joel hallas |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Good faith & John Swisher KE4CCI (long), M. P. Haynes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam?, joel hallas |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam?, Michael Melland |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |