To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion |
From: | "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:36:34 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Even a stock Orion is still well ahead of modified MP's and the $80 Inrad #762 puts it even farther ahead. That's just the facts, ma'am. Subjective or objective? OK, Bill ... using your 'facts' ... for the SSB viewpoint ... what's the real difference amount to? (Use of the #762 reflects CW only) Still odd, how many posts include the word "defective" when describing the Orion, or one of it's related parts <in this case, the CW filter>. Naaaa ... there's no QC problems ... 95% OK is just fine. B-( Merry Christmas to ALL! 73 Billy AA4NU ... one of those guys who operates more than CW. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] jackpot, argo 509 info!, Ed |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] SDR, Bob Henderson |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion, Bill Tippett |
Next by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion, Grant Youngman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |