To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Centurian 422 vs Titan III |
From: | "AD3G" <ad3g@adelphia.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:56:38 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hank...I've owned my Centurion for close to 5 years,NEVER had any problem of
any sort,it works like it should every time I use it. The extra $$$ isn't
worth the 300 watts or so you will give up vs the Titan III, in my opinion. Simpler design (less circuitry,protection and otherwise),makes for less chances for breakdown. The Centurion is a tried and true design which seems to be very reliable. Happy Holidays to everyone on the list De AD3G ----- Original Message ----- From: "HENRY PFIZENMAYER" <pfizenmayer@worldnet.att.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 12:32 PM Subject: [TenTec] Centurian 422 vs Titan III Like to hear some opinions on the new Centurian versus the Titan III . If I _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Argosy -- QSK control question, NJ0IP |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity, DSP,SDR, and General RantsRE:, Edward A. Feustel |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] Centurian 422 vs Titan III, NJ0IP |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Centurian 422 vs Titan III, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |