| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re: Resonant antennas |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Sep 2004 20:39:03 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I would venture to guess that most folks using inverted L antennas are doing so because of height limitations. The structures they have available to support their antenna are limited in height, either because of budget or regulations, or other considerations. That is my situation anyway. I suppose the horizontal sections of my inverted L may give me some QSOs I might not make if I had only a vertical. The horizontal section is such a small fraction of a wavelength above ground that the angle of radiation from that part of the antenna is very high. Not the best for DX. I would much rather have a full quarter wavelength vertical than in iverted L.The other example, is why a lot of folks have inverted L antennas. At some time of day or night, propagation may favor the combination of vertical and horizontal polarization from the same antenna, and that angled dipole certainly was capable of that. DE N6KB |
| Previous by Date: | Re: TT [TenTec] Tired of Orion, holladayfd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Tired of Orion, Bob Henderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: Resonant antennas, Stuart Rohre |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: Resonant antennas, Jim Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |