TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ SOLD

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ SOLD
From: "David E. Shelton" <n4in@insightbb.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:02:08 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I have seen the changes in the IC-756PROIII and don't think it will be all
that much better. I too will be keeping my Omni VI+. Starting to think about
selling my ProII though. 
73,
David N4IN

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Don Rasmussen
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 6:02 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ SOLD 

Dave,

The hot rumor is that Icom 756pIII may be ready for
Christmas 2004, that could be one idea for Steve. I'm
keeping my Omni VI+ eagerly await the new Icom.

The new Pro III will go for (street) $2800 or
thereabouts.

I can't help but think that the new model Icom was
created to position against TenTec's successful $3300
price on the Orion. They upgraded the 756P2 hardware
to add roofing.

Now I'm wondering if TenTec will upgrade some of the
aspects of the Orion hardware where it needs it.

Always a moving target with the transceiver models!

73,
Don


Subject:  RE: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ SOLD 
From:  "David E. Shelton" <n4in@insightbb.com> 
Reply-to:  tentec@contesting.com 
Date:  Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:56:22 -0400 
List-post:  <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 

Steve,
Why did you sell the Omni VI+? What are going to use
now? I guess it is back
to the Pro II?
CUL,
Dave

 



                
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>