Bob,
Nope..didn't get it this time either. Don't send it again until I dump this
McAfee anti-spam on my PC. Sure would like to hear an Orion putting out good
CW at either 60 or 70 wpm!
Tom - W4BQF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:36 PM
Subject: TT Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> Tom
>
> I have just sent them again. This time with a subject line of "WAV
Files."
> I suspect the previous one might have fallen victim to your Spam defences.
> I hope this one gets through.
>
> 73 Bob, 5B4AGN
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 3:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
>
>
> > Bob....
> >
> > I did not receive the wav files. Sure would appreciate it if you would
> send
> > them again to aldermant@alltel.net
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Tom - W4BQF
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
> > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:21 PM
> > Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> >
> >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > Yes I monitored rf output with a seperate receiver. I've sent you two
> > .wav
> > > files of what my Orion produces at 60 wpm.
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:07 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > >
> > >
> > > > Since you are a very astute ham Bob, I will just assume you did that
> > while
> > > > listening to your Orion on a different receiver. The Orion's
sidetone
> > > works
> > > > OK at 70 wpm, but the two Orions I have certainly will not send
> > correctly
> > > > timed/spaced CW over about 50 wpm. No one that I have sent CW at
> speeds
> > > > over 50 wpm can copy it because the timing is so messed up. And it
is
> > not
> > > my
> > > > PC or DGM keyboard since I have asked two fellow hams to try their
> > > Orions
> > > > at 50 and 60 wpm, with the same results.
> > > >
> > > > I agree, I don't know anyone, except a few German hams, who send at
70
> > wpm
> > > > with a keyer.
> > > >
> > > > Tom - W4BQF
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
> > > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:06 AM
> > > > Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Tom
> > > > >
> > > > > You have me confused now for sure!
> > > > >
> > > > > When you say you "can work around" the QSK switching issue, does
> that
> > > mean
> > > > > by not bothering with QSK or do you have a cunning work around
that
> > > hasn't
> > > > > occurred to me?
> > > > >
> > > > > I have just run my Orion at 70 wpm for half an hour and I don't
hear
> > > > > anything wrong with the code sent. Incidentally, I did not use
the
> > > > internal
> > > > > keyer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bob, 5B4AGN
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> > > > > To: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>;
<tentec@contesting.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:02 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I don't have an issue with the QSK switching, one can work
around
> > > that.
> > > > > What
> > > > > > I have an issue with is that most radios I have operated, that
> > employ
> > > > > > digital techniques, do not send CW correctly at speed over 40
wpm.
> > > > > > Especially Ten Tec radios.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom - W4BQF
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I do it differently -- that is, I try to use radios that give
me
> > the
> > > > > > maximum
> > > > > > > time between dits to listen. And part of what I think W4BQF is
> > > > > > > complaining about with high speed CW may be that some radios
> just
> > > > > > > don't switch fast enough.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jim K9YC
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|