If I understand it correctly, Stan please correct me if I am wrong, the
Paragon and Paragon II are basically the same rig except for the processor
board and AM operation.
Having said that, what I find interesting is that if you look at the ARRL
product reviews, the Paragon has better Minimum discernible signal,
dynamic range, two tone third order IMD dynamic range and third order
intercept point than the Omni VI Plus. Both of which were tested under the
same conditions as I read the review.
Anyway, if you have those issues, May 1988 and November 1997, you might
want to read them for yourself. Or you can look them up on the ARRL web
site if you are a member.
Dan
"Wayne Bilodeau" <wayneb@lightstream.net>
Sent by: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
08/11/2004 12:56 PM
Please respond to
tentec@contesting.com
To
tentec@contesting.com
cc
Subject
[TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II
Hello,
Can anyone please tell me the significant differences between an Omni VI+
(option 3 upgrade) and a Paragon II other than noise reduction, shortwave
bands, and AM ?
I am thinking about trading an Omni VI+ fully loaded for a Paragon II
fully loaded( yes, I know...crazy) because I want shortwave bands and AM
capability. I was a shortwave listener prior to ham radio and kinda miss
it.
73 de KC8Q
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|